Shite of different flavors

My favorite thing about Skyline is that aliens with astonishing technology travel lightyears across the stars to eat our brains. That is, unfortunately, the only thing I liked about the movie. But it seems such a carefully-constructed piece of marketing, I get intrigued: the right blend of youthful stars, a certain WB-flavored twenty-something romantic-angst (and a subplot involving Love that carries through–in wonderfully risible fashion–to the film’s final moments), a leeriness about being too gory… pitched right in the 13-23 sweet spot. Sucked royally, but it was exactly what it wanted to be.

How Do You Know, on the other hand, is a fascinatingly inept blunder. There is here a very, very, very familiar romantic triangle with perfectly-cast leads, just enough in the way of subplots to make that trite central arc seem character-driven rather than generically-predestined. And yet the beats and rhythm of every scene are off. There is a first meeting between beleaguered nice-guy businessman-under-fire Paul Rudd and nice-gal serious-athlete-cut-from-the-team Reese Witherspoon that boggled my mind: if I saw the script, hell even if I sat in the editing room with these very takes, I could imagine this being punchy dialogue, coy revelations of character which set the stage for the two to come together . . . but the scene slows to a crawl, long pauses between dialogue, weirdly-intense two-shots, a treacly soundtrack (with a hint of a sad Rufus Wainwright song?) cuing the audience in an entirely different direction. It’s like a Billy Wilder script got directed by Sammy Maudlin.

Okay, it’s not a Billy Wilder script. But there’s something smart in much of the dialogue, and there are strong actors everywhere — what the hell happened here? It’s kind of amazing, because it’s so incompetent, by a guy with a helluva track record of more-than-competent.

Eastwood is touched by ghosts

Late in Hereafter, tsunami victim and once-ruthless hot French journalist Marie DeLay reads from her investigation _Hereafter: A Conspiracy of Silence_, some lines about how we have such trouble dealing with death that we come up with foolish accounts that cover up our difficulties really engaging. I almost expected her to look into the camera, turning the film on a dime from its painstaking hours of staking out people’s rather dull pain to a bitter send-up of such hankie-baiting twaddle.

Alas, no. The sad boy gets to cry (finally) and then gets a hug from mom, and the sad man gets to feel a connection with others’ pain (finally) and then the promise of a kiss, and so on. Tidy. Tedious. Twaddle.

Sure thing

Sherlock, the reboot which has Holmes texting to taunt Lestrade and Watson recently returned from Afghanistan, is a kick. Episode one (of three) recreates “A Study in Scarlet” with a lot of nice flourishes that an old Holmesteader could enjoy while delighting the complete newbie sitting on the couch next to me, aping the stiff arrogant voice of Benedict Cumberbatch, who nails his portrayal of Holmes. Martin Freeman is another precisely-calibrated choice, reminding of and revising our sense of Watson. We’ll see where it goes, but while I sort of enjoyed Guy Ritchie’s manic boys-will-be-etc. hyperbole, this was a lot better. . .

Varmints

Gore Verbinski’s Rango riffs on the West and the Western, never quite escaping the gravity well of genre conventions; it also nimbly dances through the minefields of cheap reductive parody or punch(line)drunken gag-sap-gag-moral-gag-triumph which crowd the children’s animated film market, yet has the stray belch or manic action sequence or bow-wrapped final-reel redemption which keeps things familiar.

Who gives a shit? Look at that picture. Continue reading Varmints

Night Catches Us

Tanya Hamilton’s first flick slowly teases out the backstory, and it has a few moments of “big”(gish) Event of Consequence–but it’s at its strongest and most affecting in allowing its characters (and us) to steep in the aftermath. Set in 1976 Philadelphia, Night follows a few former Black Panthers and a neighborhood somewhat at peace but still scarred from a collision between brutal cops and an outraged violent resistance to such brutality. Marcus (Anthony Mackie) is back for his father’s funeral, but isn’t welcome, and isn’t comfortable; Patti (Kerry Washington) never left town, raises her daughter, reaches out a hand (and legal counsel) to “every orphan” in the neighborhood. You can pick at some of the overdetermined details of the plot arc, but Hamilton’s got a brilliant sense of silence and space — she lets these FANTASTIC actors simmer, calmly sit in a room together, take solace from one another. They’re amazing (and so is Jamie Hector, a.k.a. Marlo Stanfield). She’s edited many sequences to remove dialogue, or to cut things together leaving little blips and jumps that just slightly undermine naturalism; there are a few shots–police walking through an early-morning field, camera set on the ground and capturing them from the knees down, fireflies lifting up from each footfall.

The film also resists some neat Romanticism or Cynical twists, allowing a rich sense of how important the Panthers were in affirming community bonds–the vision of beret-clad violence explicitly critiqued, ‘though Hamilton’s empathy for that turn to struggle is equally strong.

Good movie. And a director to watch.

Enter the Void

Gaspar Noe’s film is shot almost entirely in p.o.v., the protagonist a young guy doing and dealing drugs in a seedy, emphatically-neon Tokyo. Early voiceovers–where he tells himself things that no sapient creature would ever need to say, or even think, as the camera watches from his vantage, hands fumbling forward into frame to unlock a door, to grab his stash, to burn a pipe.

And yet–even early on, with some of this stilted narration, and the artifice of the p.o.v. ploy, there are cluttered rushes of image:

the apartment Continue reading Enter the Void

Four Lions

I am constitutionally primed to enjoy a film which yuks it up around subjects that terrify or infuriate, and when I heard about Chris Morris’ slapsticky take on radicalized English Muslims, intent on joining the jihad through suicide bombing… well, damn. How fantastically inappropriate–perhaps it would be a more vigorous bit of tomfoolery than Albert Brooks’ Looking for Comedy in the Moslem World. It was. And it was even better yet: Morris uses familiar conventions (the hapless schmoes, on a foolish quest) which amplify our identification, and the film’s final moments had a surprising emotional edge.


Continue reading Four Lions

Some kind of yearly best seen favorite good attempt to get into the zeitgeisty list mood

In no particular order, and based on things I saw this year, ignoring “real” release dates:
The Kids Are All Right
Please Give
Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World
Police, Adjective
A Prophet
Exit Through the Gift Store
The Wild and Wonderful Whites
Winter’s Bone
Mystery Team
The Social Network
Crazy Stone
Collapse
Hunger
The Chaser
House of the Devil

And I watched little tv but caught a few shows via on-demand or netflix, and some were so awesome like OMG!

Damages, season 1 (Thanks for the rec, Gio!)
Louie
Party Down
Community
The Thick of It, all three seasons

Three good films

I’ve fallen behind on scribbling thoughts, so my apologies for this unwieldy lumping of three disparate films into a catch-all “worth seeing.” But they do share a central focus on character development and outstanding acting, and they all fall a few points shy of being outstanding–‘though still definitely worth your time. (Two of them are on dvd, and didn’t play far/wide in theaters; one of those didn’t, as best I can tell, play anywhere in the states.)

Continue reading Three good films