Speaking of Spielberg,
I bought the 35th anniversary DVD of “Jaws” yesterday, which includes a making-of documentary (a version of which I had already seen) in which Spielberg says that he was drawn to the script of “Jaws” because he thought it was essentially the same film he had just made, “Duel.” And as I tried to point out in comments to Mike’s “War of the Worlds” post of 7/1 , isn’t it possible to say he’s been remaking “Duel” ever since?
The 35th anniversary edition DVD is quite good, but should I have just waited a few more years for the 40th anniversary DVD? Or the 42nd anniversary DVD? Or the 50th anniversary blu-ray disc? Or the 53rd anniversary Holographic Versatile Disc? Or the eagerly awaited 75th diamond anniversary mindmeld, with bonus Robert Shaw clone?
Seriously, I was browsing through the DVD section of our local B&N, and I saw in the shelves, back to back, the 30th anniversary and the 35th anniversary DVDs of “Easy Rider.” Now, I like the film. But does ANY film, good or bad, need to be repackaged that quickly? What’s so “special” about this “special edition” if it is to become obsolete in 5 years? I think the time between DVD editions should be no less than 10 years, and only if something significant has occurred, like major restoration of original negatives. “Last chance to own ‘Pinocchio’ on DVD, so act now!” Does anyone really believe that?
Well, no. I bet Michael Ovitz’ nose grew as they issued the Pinocchio press release.
And, yes, it’s crazy all this dvd edition mania. I feel burned that I bought a completely fine copy of Eternal Sunshine when it came out, only to see three months later that a new “special” edition, with a couple more extras, came out. And I’m holding my breath for the big combined Kill Bill set.
On the other hand, I think it’s funny that they’ve just put out The Jerk in a 26th-anniversary edition.
Ovitz’ nose? What was I thinking? His wallet.